The ‘Gold Digger’ in film and literature

By Hannah Anstee

The word ÔÇÿgold diggerÔÇÖ has been around since the 19th century, and while it initially meant anyone that was obsessed with gaining money, by the early 20th century it was being used as an insult specifically aimed at women. Gold diggers are typically portrayed as young, beautiful, self-obsessed women with almost no interests outside of fashion and living a life of luxury. However, they also go against some traditional stereotypes for women, often having no interest in children, and no desire to do any typical ÔÇÿhousewifeÔÇÖ chores like cooking or cleaning. But why is using this word specifically so harmful?

When Lady Gaga talks about her recent role as Patrizia Reggiani in House of Gucci, she insists that Patrizia is not a ÔÇ£sexy gold diggerÔÇØ. While that is debatable (youÔÇÖll have to watch it yourself to decide!) the fact remains that Lady Gaga sees it as an insult, and that being labelled as a gold digger would define PatriziaÔÇÖs whole character for people going to watch it for the first time – despite her being so much more.

Two iconic examples – though there are many more – of gold diggers onscreen are Debbie Jellinsky, the villain in Addams Family Values (1993), and Marilyn in Intolerable Cruelty (2003). Debbie is portrayed as a psychopathic black widow, having killed her parents as a child for getting her the wrong barbie doll, and having murdered all her past husbands. While she is so stereotypical it becomes satirical, Debbie is the result of years of women in film being portrayed as emotionless and cruel if they value wealth, and really drives home all the negative traits people have connoted to gold diggers.

Contrastingly, Marilyn is an extremely skilled gold digger who, despite setbacks, ends up gaining an enormous fortune through inheritance by the end of the film. She is beautiful, but also sophisticated, intelligent, and funny. She isnÔÇÖt shown in a negative light more than the rest of the cast of morally dubious millionaires, and I ended up fully supporting her as she made her way through three husbands.

Of course, by the end of the movie she decides ÔÇ£independence is a two-edged swordÔÇØ and marries the romantic male lead Miles Massey (George Clooney). After gaining all the wealth she could ever need, she realised she was lonely and married a man who had less wealth than her. This is the thing that really makes Marilyn empathetic as a character; she never apologises for marrying for money, but that doesnÔÇÖt mean she is emotionless or cruel. She just wanted the freedom to choose what to do with her life.

In comparison, many people found it hard to truly empathise with Daisy in The Great Gatsby (whether the book or film adaptation), a character you likely didnÔÇÖt expect to see in this article. A lover of decadence and luxury in true 1920ÔÇÖs form, she was born into aristocracy and money. She might not be a typical rags-to-riches gold digger, but she states herself that she only married Tom for the stability of his old money wealth and status. To her, keeping the money and lifestyle she was born into is more important than anyone or anything else.

Even today, women that marry older, wealthy men tend to get looks – thereÔÇÖs a certain unspoken consensus that the woman must be a gold digger. Unfortunately, because of all the other connotations we have with this word after decades of cruel and shallow characters, people donÔÇÖt stop to consider any other reasons she may have had ÔÇô even one as simple as love.

However, itÔÇÖs becoming increasingly common for people to hold judgement for the men in these situations too. Marrying someone for money isnÔÇÖt the most moral thing you can do, but neither is marrying someone younger than your children solely for their body. When thereÔÇÖs such a large difference in age and wealth, the younger party is in a significantly more vulnerable position. The gold digger trope pushes the blame of an unhealthy situation solely onto the womanÔÇÖs shoulders, and itÔÇÖs only when we move away from it that we can recognise the complexities of real people and relationships.